“(Judge)
Barrett declined to say whether it would be constitutional to criminalize the
practice of in vitro fertilization. During a separate round of questioning, the
previously outspoken social conservative declined to say whether she
considers IVF tantamount to manslaughter. ‘I’ve never expressed a view on it,
and for the reasons I’ve already stated, I cannot take policy positions or
express my personal views before the committee,’ Barrett said.” (The
Daily 202 on-line The Washington Post)
meybe
IVF is not tantamount to manslaughter – she hides behind the word – rather she is
opposed to IVF and was a signee on a document published in a newspaper
advertisement by St. Joseph County Right to Life
he wouldnt suppose
she was placed under duress emotionally or physically to sign her name
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/oct/01/amy-coney-barrett-supported-group-fertilization
the judge continues to evade Democratic
senators questions providing non-answers insisting her integrity should be trusted
however if she were ethicalif she had integritty
she would have declined Drumpfs nomination
1452, Day-between-Two-Ts, 14 10.
20
No comments:
Post a Comment