11.7.25


he tried to figure what his comment had anything to do with their threeway conversation

he was encouraged that she  trio part  looked as confused as was banginround inside his skull but which he was able to restrain from showing on his face
                                                     she wasnt his critical audience as frequent as he
Yawanna run tha past me again

Weren’t you listening?

I was Though wha I heard was preposterous
                                                 So again  please
So I can ascertain if I had shit in my ears or shit oozed from your mout

Shit?

Man  Your opportunity to relate it again or change it up to save face

motherfucker was dug in he heard precisely wha he said
                                                               curiosity had him question it
Can you hear me?
                           pompous ass
I can

I said took a deepdraumatic ridiculous breath should have been in movies  silent films
                                                                              At first do no harm.
thought Yup  Hippocratic Oath
                               Not thatha had anything to do with whawe were discussin
You really whippin out the Hippocratic Oath

I thought it was appropriate.

confusion doubleddown in her face cat had her tongue
                                                           he winked at her I got this
If youre blowin in out of the blue in response to our banter Id say Do no harm  But if they want harm go after it enthusiastically

what ran through her mind was a comment he made to her a weektwo back about being a masochist
    A masochist?
Ja
    I was the masochist my Maw the sadist

Cant have one without the other

expression on her face then was more fuckedup than the current one

gal really had elastic features
                                 her freckles made her puss look like a Rorschach
though
           he couldntwouldnt dare a guess

would take the Fifth

Sunday afternoon,  6   7.  25
1615,  reggaefriday,  11  7. 25
Marianne Faithfull  Why D’ya Do It?  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYmK3PYQnGg

he was Chautauquaing
                         thats when hes on YouTube catching a lecture an interview about subjects that curry his favourhis  attention

had grammar school been like Chautauqua he wouldnt have been abradedablated coerced attempted to be indoctrinated   propagandised

    some kids were better at it than him

 

she said  UBI . . . 

                       she and the podcast host were eminently aware what the acronym meantnot him
he disliked acronyms with extreme prejudice

he paused the programmeGoogled what the hell UBI was
                                                               Ubiquitous Computing
THAT OUGHT TO SCARE THE HELL OUT OF ANYBODY

pervasive computing

ambient intelligence

embedding into everything

ANYTIME

ANYWHERE
he almost shit

    definitely captured his attention

2034,  Tuesday,  8  7. 25
1311,  reggaefriday,  11  7. 25

better get to it
               defend breasts as mammaries not grown to lurenot for mens pleasure as his ahole buddy believes

Knock yourself out I disagree
                               Who the hell coined  secondary sexual characteristics
So you agree they are.
Biologically speaking  Thas wha theyre referred to
                                                      They develop as boys an girls mature Its called puberty

I agree that some old white ma . .
. . There you go after men again . . assaulting them . .
. . Fuckinclowns need to be assaulted
                                        Theyve been assaulting girlswomen a minimum tenthousand years 
Whens enough for you
Ive had it withem

 
    Back to my point
                       Who coined it  If you refuse to believe it wasnt some old white man

I’ve no idea.  smiled
                            he could feel Wittgensteins Whereof thereof phrase foaming in his head
                                                                                                        Therefore, I can’t say.
I can
        Charles Darwin
He alluded to itcalled it a second agency Alongside natural selection

Then English biologist Ronald Fisher described secondary sexual characteristics in his 1930 book The Genetic Theory of Natural Selection

    Why would you know that?
Because
            Every time we get together for coffee bullshit you bring it up an Im sick an tired of ya goin onanon tha breasts developed solely to appeal an to appease men

An old white women coudnt have stepped into the fray to name to coin whaya pine for  Erroneously

Breasts formed to feed babies  Step furthur
                                              Asya know I come from a huge familymy mother one of thirteen siblings hence   minimum thirteen wives five children were the smallest family among the family  We congregated at my grandmothers house

 

 

You’re point?

    Pretty fuckin obvious

What’s obvious.

 

Your family
              Compared to mine
You had an aunt
Your Maw

              Ill assume your aunt an mother breastfed


What’s you’re point?

    At any given gathering when I was a young three or four of my aunts breastfed out in the livingroom  Natural as the day is long
Because
           Breasts hadnt been sexualised to the overwhelming extent as they are today

Tits didnt develop to appease men                                                                                     

Ill assume you havent indelible memories of your mother aunt breastfeeding
                                                                                 Only your wife

So I can understand  an pity you thayathink breasts were made for you
They werent

Address another issue tha piques you before ya get there circumvent you
                                                                                 Before I had sexual urges
For years I knew the function of breasts thathey were unlike the lure you believe

Well . . well . well . . . . some women have breast enlargementsdon’t tell me they’re not doing that to attract men.  Secondary SEXUAL characteristics.

I woudnt know
                 I havent augmented my cock to appeal to women maybe according to you a secondary sexual characteristicwhich in fact incorrect gonads  testicles   not truly ones cock

    Yaoughta them why

I wouldn’t do that.

Then shaddup

Thursday afternoon,  10  7. 25
1058,  reggaefriday,  11  7. 25

Youre defendinem

We’re not defending them.
                              they huddled closer together so not to be flanked forcing headlong attacks

Methinks thou dost protests too much
                                         Misquoting Shakespeare Hamlet  Steppinon Queen Gertrudes line

    We’re supposed to reply to that?

Youre vigorously opposing memy word
                                          So Ive said was keeping with Shakespeare  Wha say ye

Not all.


    I didnt say all
You implied all.

I said billionaires are immoral
                                Not all   Certainly not an implication
I was explicit

she looked over to her cohort her back to back partner who like he felt they had to assume defensive postures
    opposite them they knew him to be aggressive
                                                     they werent
they drew comfort in numbers
                                 evenif the numbers did not coincide identically with their aspirations
fiftyone fortynine was plenty good for them

while he was willing to die on every hill every molehill   every dungheap
                                                                                                 Sheeit  I thought it was a hill
Nonetheless I did gain elevation acquired  higher ground



looking away from him she spoke for them
                                              We don’t agree.

pushing an entomological pin for insects either a No. 2 or a No. 3  a pin is gentler than a hook hooks devastate flesh
    Why do you disagree

her bound male cohort rallied Does that really matter?
                                                         How often have I asked you, questioned you further and you’ve replied, DONE?

I reply done because when I ask something I also stake my claimmake my mind obvious

DONE is in retaliation refusing to repeat myselfwaste my time

You disagree that billionaries arent immoral

Immoral is givinem something

I didnt say amoral

To amass billions of dollarsmaybe atop seed money leftem  many have been bequeathed
                                                                                                Letem keep a billion  Tha on top take
Next year tax time
                    Take it again
Now
       If only we had a legitimate expert body to wiselyIll say it  redistribute those billions an billions of dollars
Trickle down

    Only piss an shit trickles down


My idea  one  Im sure of many many solutions

                                                           So
 

So what?

Why are billionaires not immoral     

Sunday afternoon,  6  7. 25
0958,  reggaefriday,  11  7. 25