his cohort tacitly accepted his
premise not that his acceptance or even
agreement would enthuse him
but looking at the equation he
said No
cohort asked No?
My equation is unacceptable I shouldnt have written it with an equal sign
his cohort tacitly accepted his
premise not that his acceptance or even
agreement would enthuse him
but looking at the equation he
said No
cohort asked No?
My equation is unacceptable I shouldnt have written it with an equal sign
Do I always
What does it mean?
Your high?
Orbiter dictum?
Yah
a pull-quote “It is critical for the American people to
have confidence in the integrity of taxpayer dollars sent to support Ukraine
and its people.”
he remembers pallets of shrink-wrapped onehunred dollar bills sent to Iraq remembers Bush/Bremers Coalition Provisional Government in Iraq remembers cash handed to warlord bribes as US military strategy
fiscal responsibility
suddenly Republicans care
mightily
despite giving themselves a pass
after September 11 pass: the War on
Terror – enhanced interrogation pass: You
are either with US or against US tacit
threat
hadnt heard it before
Im sorry again ifya don mind I wanna be sure I heard you
correctly
Sure. I said deplore tolerate embrace.
Swing from deplore to embrace
Yes.
How does one even get to
tolerate
I could I think . . evolve . given the right circumstances.
I don’t remember.