28.3.22


late getting back to the gamehe felt horrible 
                                          he felt horrible despite attending recent grief and sorrows of his own
  1,004,244
              onemillionfourthousandtwohunredfortyfour DEAD Americans

he attributed each and every one to Trump virus
                                                       he named it for the despicable human been who is in It only for himself

2252,  Monday,  28  3. 22


Tom Cot Ton

You know you haven’t said why you call him that?

Its wha he deserves Tom Dum Dum


he attacked Dum Dum had prior referred to his attacks so itd be ridiculous to label them otherwise it was his naming he said that the centerpiecesigh of Judge Jacksons hearings was child pornography or rather his clever slick sentences and sex crimes coud see in his face it really pleased him a real zinger
                                                                        “Do you really, do you really expect this committee to believe you do not remember what happened in this Hawkins case when it came back before you?”by this point he was talking over Judge Jackson answer who replied “Yes senator, I do expect you to believe . .”Dum Dum interrupted “Well, I don’t find it credible, judge, it’s been in the news for days, I just don’t find it credible that you were prepared for that matter in 2019. You know what I think? I think you got caught with child pornography again and you wouldn’t have been if (Wesley Hawkins) had been in prison (according) to the eight to 10 year guideline that was called for in 2013. (from 8:12:30 to 8:12:59 on the recording)”

“You know what I think?”
                           safe to say everyone knew what Dum Dum thought when he named Judge Jacksons Judiciary hearing centerpiece sentences and sex crimes an called her a liar albeit I don’t find (you) credible who is he to cast aspersionsquestion the judges honesty integrity  veracity


he thought I coud puke   
1710,  Monday,  28  3. 22
2100,  Monday
Day 3  Judiciary confirmation hearing for Kentanji Brown Jackson  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VwYTg4JyI5k

Kentaji Brown Jackson repeatedly told her questioners that judgment cannot be decided by single facet that no one thing can override all the other legal factors and considerations that require evaluation 
                                                                                     “Lack of proportionality can never by itself prove dilution, for courts must always carefully and searchingly review the totality of the circumstances. (an anonymous Supreme Court per curiam opinion)”  https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21a471_097c.pdf


That’s a mighty nice way of thinking of things, that yours or did you hear it elsewhere someone else say it?

Ya kiddin me  I always give credit where credits due  Its wha I saidthink  Wha I believe

It’s amazing.

Nah cant say I agree Seems so much common sense to me
                                                              When you give a thought to our appetitesall the ideas details personalities circumstances theyre difficult to keep track of sorted Like yourself Id like to be able to cite chapter an verse who said it wrote it when but I you we consume too much When push comes to shove I can ferretfind it out  eventually  but in the moment other than knowing it to be true I often stumble 
                                                                                   But as I said we understand the contours the colours so while precise details might allude us their premises do not anperhaps while they are pale or pastel to begin withwere just learning them the more we learn the deeper more vivid the colours the subject matter becomes

That’s it! Righteous.
                      Have you written that down yet?

No I really don have to Ive thought this way a long time Reflex now

You ought to write it down and then email it to me . . I’ll forget . you know me.

Really Yare a photographer keen of lighting colours I think its right up your alley  Ya wont forget

You know me better than that.

Yare not gonna try

Please . . just email it to me would you.

     he did  hed say to his chagrin   but he forgot where he put it
1229,  Saturday,  26  3. 22
1159,  Monday,  28  3. 22


he was almost done listening to all the hours of questions and Judge Ketanji Brown Jacksons testimony during Senate Judicial Committees Supreme Court hearing

Republicans have a thing about child pornography religion race    Court precedent

they were absolutely shrill regarding the judges sentencing in pornography cases  SHRILL that since 2019 child pornography on computers have risen exponentially  asif it were her fault that Congress wasnt keeping pace

the thingComon  with all the discussion of factors weighed
                                                                 weigh common sense   
it had bare bone explanations for the exponential rise since 2019

Trump virus

adults working from home on computers

children schooled at home on computers
                                           depression rose  suicides rose  alcohol and drug use rose
struck him too  Opportunity rose

horribly  common sense points its finger
                                              he couldnt be the only one seeing it

1653,  Sunday,  27  3. 22
1014,  Monday,  28  3. 22


Come on now, it’s said people only use ten percent of their brai . .
. . Ridiculous  Fallacy Myth   Improbable

Bam bam bam just like that, pretty abrupt.

Missed a BAM  Exactly like that

You don’t seem to care that others believ . .
. . Ignorance
              All they need do is look in a mirror
If we only used ten percent of our brains then we would have evolvedbeen fashioned into pinheads with scarcely shit needing to be protected a bone cap on top the reptilian brain However our skulls are larger in order to encompass an protect our brains with a bone helmet

You give no cred . .
. . Sorry to interrupt again  Myth  Zero credence  no more than I would believe in myths of religion


Where were you going with your argument

    he sighed
                 I don’t remember  What were we talking about prior?

Possibly though difficult to believe considering what proceeded thereafter I believe it was the dimensionality of the brain
      You seemed very attracted to the term dimensionality  like you were looking at a Playboy centerfold  Anif thas the case why did you argue ten percent in light of brain dimensionality  Tryin to pick a fight a battle of wits   Please half the time ya cant recall a large percent of wha yave just said


he twisted in the wind  no reply 

Thursday afternoon,  24  3. 22
1625,  Sunday,  27  3. 22