Awright   somethings afootdefinitely  queer     was approximately 2:30PM 

                                                  Witching hour  3AM

2:30 Thursday  21Sept

2:30 Saturday  23Sept

closing on the intersection at Rosario

Thursday crickets chirping during daylighthed never heard crickets chirp in the daylight

Saturday walkinreadin he hears a sharp clickclickclick a prance knows its a deer looks up an coming straight at him a sixpoint buck  a twoyear old

                               when he collapsed the book to his chestsaid Hello goodlookin the buck veered righttaking the corner headedup Rosario he watched it as it stopped two oncoming cars a third that came up behind it the clickclickclick suggested mild panic a buck in the neighbourhood isnt helpless hooves horns  can fuck somebody up real badnot him  he was not threatening

   crickets buck

broad daylight

next time he headed in that direction hed time it out see if possibly three times would be a charm

                                                                                                      seek the unknowable till he knew

reminding him of the ongoing A I argument he has with his brother-in-law trying to point out that computers lack the ability to speculate the ability to recognise the probability possibilities  alternate answers

                                                                                                How so?

You say computers can give us the answeroutcome for a delineated problem which rational people ought to comply with since they engagedemployed the tool A I 

Yes. 

No 

     First because no matter the solution it has to be implemented by human beings who cant agree between themselves let alone with a prejudicedthere was a programmer  a prejudiced biased tool

I disagree.

   I know you do

                   Secondly to use yours Rumsfelds unknown unknowns which I agree we cannot know however we can speculatefor instance cause and effect I suggest there are breaks in the chain an while computers can use everything known it cannot factor in what it doesnt cannot speculate hence a break   for instance language  its believed a language Ill call A has gone extinct it merely went underground  it resurfaces years later to some prominence  the computer will not recognise A but rather the recent knowable Aprime  thereby not factoring in A the underground A  absence of evidence is not evidence of absenceyou know tha  Wha Im sayin is there are contingencies speculations parallelifya woud  worldsNo I can see your expression  then fine  there exist parallel options numerous Aprimes that are not evaluated

I don’t think so.

But ya don know

                   A I is a tool not the be-all end-all

   hence why hed time himself to arrive at the Rosario intersection for approximately 2:30  to learn one way or the other

it was queer

does queer timedhappen  in the daylight

1224,  Sunday,  24  9. 23

Elton John  Tiny Dancer  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5g4MSYK5d3A  Rumsfeld Unknowns  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=REWeBzGuzCc