28.3.22


Tom Cot Ton

You know you haven’t said why you call him that?

Its wha he deserves Tom Dum Dum


he attacked Dum Dum had prior referred to his attacks so itd be ridiculous to label them otherwise it was his naming he said that the centerpiecesigh of Judge Jacksons hearings was child pornography or rather his clever slick sentences and sex crimes coud see in his face it really pleased him a real zinger
                                                                        “Do you really, do you really expect this committee to believe you do not remember what happened in this Hawkins case when it came back before you?”by this point he was talking over Judge Jackson answer who replied “Yes senator, I do expect you to believe . .”Dum Dum interrupted “Well, I don’t find it credible, judge, it’s been in the news for days, I just don’t find it credible that you were prepared for that matter in 2019. You know what I think? I think you got caught with child pornography again and you wouldn’t have been if (Wesley Hawkins) had been in prison (according) to the eight to 10 year guideline that was called for in 2013. (from 8:12:30 to 8:12:59 on the recording)”

“You know what I think?”
                           safe to say everyone knew what Dum Dum thought when he named Judge Jacksons Judiciary hearing centerpiece sentences and sex crimes an called her a liar albeit I don’t find (you) credible who is he to cast aspersionsquestion the judges honesty integrity  veracity


he thought I coud puke   
1710,  Monday,  28  3. 22
2100,  Monday
Day 3  Judiciary confirmation hearing for Kentanji Brown Jackson  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VwYTg4JyI5k

Kentaji Brown Jackson repeatedly told her questioners that judgment cannot be decided by single facet that no one thing can override all the other legal factors and considerations that require evaluation 
                                                                                     “Lack of proportionality can never by itself prove dilution, for courts must always carefully and searchingly review the totality of the circumstances. (an anonymous Supreme Court per curiam opinion)”  https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21a471_097c.pdf

No comments:

Post a Comment