cocksuckers: “. . since Roe v. Wade (it is estimated) . . .
more than 58 million unborn children have lost their lives”
how do you argue that deduction?
how do you argue that deduction?
do you really have to point out an unborn animal CANNOT lose a life
it never had
you could assume their prevailing counterargument of course Life instantaneously begins with the animating spark at conception at fertilization(a union of gametes an egg and sperm which cannot be attested to as to when it occurs -- precisely)
insemination does not confer LIFE
BEYOND that moment or birth to any particular yoked zygote
conception by various legal
and illegal means(rape incest) does not confer completion
it is not a remote untethered
ball set down and rolled downhill unimpeded on its singular physics
to say that it is is violence
to say that it is is defamation
of ones individuality and autonomy
they do not say how they derived their estimation
though I would opine the 58
million(served – McDonalds) is to incite and inflame their minions
it is attested without fact(not that zealots are concerned with facts or reality) or data supporting their assertion
it is tenuous
it is attested without fact(not that zealots are concerned with facts or reality) or data supporting their assertion
it is tenuous
if he used their logic he might posit that ejaculation via masturbation is a crime and deserved severe punishment -- certainly more than a slap on the wrist
0652, Thursday,
2 6. 16
0726, Friday,
3 6. 16
No comments:
Post a Comment