fuckin proofsfuckin  Geometry

                                the D he got in high school was because he worked hard to earn it  his teacher said hed never “not never ever ever” witnessed a kid work so hard and fail  “I can’t, not in good conscience, fail you.”

worked like a motherfucker for that D

Geometry never clicked

too reasonable

too rational

he was abstract

The Thomatic Argument . .

. . Thomatic

              Thomas Aquinas

Yes. Look at you.

                  You’re not religious how did you know?

Because Im wellread anevery time you go south visit your Jesusfreak sisters something rubs off on you anya try to rub it off on meAND

               The word argument in your mouth sounds like ProofsAND

                                                                            I despiseya know I do  Geometry

Its tha little bug thas crawled up your ass thaya think is fuckin hilarious to badger me with

You ought to see your face.

My thoroughly uninterestednotdisinterested face

                                                   Its got to be ghastly  Matches my desire to vomit on your shirtfront an shoes

Count your blessings appropriately dude

   Whatever.

               You know what the argument is?

Is this the argument tha answers my question

Maybe.

          What did you ask?

FUCK

       Were too busy thinkin of a comeback a reply rather than listen to me

I heard you.

Hearing an listening are two different things

                                               A sticky duopoly if ever was

Yahear a lot

              Ya don listen much

Enough lecture. No. I didn’t listen to you.

You ought to see tha look on your face

                                          Suffice it to say yalook like a retard  A yahoo

I wish you wouldn’t use that word.

If wishes were horses beggars woud ride

                                            I asked who said Mans ultimate desire is to be Gawd  Figured since ya just got back from a weekend with the Freaks

Cute.

Not

The Thomatic Argument attempts to reason from the existence of dependent beings to the existence of God.

Thas a mouthful Though Im premature

                                           Excuse my interruption

he shook his head asif long hair got in his eyes

when he visited he got his hair cut

                                     also

had a selection of baseball caps to choose from so there was never a chance hair would ever get in his eyes

unlike his hair

                Sally forth  SallyAnnUgly

What?

Im amusing myself before you bore me to death with a religious proof

But you want to hear.

No  Ill listen

             Letya get it off your chest  I imagine it metastasized in your head the entire five hours north

I did it in four.

Never a cop around whenya need one

A speeding ticket.

Yah In your Vette ya think youre Mario Andretti

It’s a high performance car.

It is

      Makes up for what you lack

Fuck yo . .

. . Not before ya finish your sisters proof

                                           Please SallyAnnUgly

he grumbled something couldnt hear cleared his throat

                                                          I think you can hang with me. There’s only five premises.

Premise away

One.

      There are dependent things.

Two.

      If something is a dependent being . .

. . Im not

he stared him down

                        A dependent being, then its continued existence must be sustained by something else . .

. . Sustained   Like you

if looks could kill

                   Number three.

If a dependent being is sustained by something else, then either the chain of sustaine . .

. . Chain

          Unfortunate

arent you dead

                 You gonna keep interrupting?

Ought to vehemently suggest Im still listening

                                                    SallyAnnUgly

The chain of sustained beings . .

. . Thank Gawd they graduated from dependent things

You’re not going to stop are you?

Were nearly through three theres only five

                                            Almost there  I gotta humour myself to get through Thomas

   

   The chain of sustained beings regresses infinitely or terminates in an independent being that is not itself sustained.

Nothing?

The chain of sustained beings cannot regress infinitely.

Therefore, number five . .

. . Whereof thereof Wittgenstein

                                  Ill take his advise  I cant say

No  Im not dead 

                 Save your fuckin looks for someone who can be intimidated

Therefore . . . the chain of sustained beings must terminate in an independent being that is not itself sustained.

Yah   Don knowdon care whatha means

Glad you got it out

                   Imagine if youd been on the road five hours

Yamight have a halo

Thanks for the lesson

                        Annnnn  Im lettin it go

You’re not going towe’re not going to entertain it?

   Wha

         Uninterested

Its adios

Didnt get an answer to my query  SallyAnnUgly

                                                      Tha Ill remember

AMish,  Tuesday,  10  8. 02

1401,  Satyrday,  15  6. 24

https://apologetics315.com/2018/07/the-thomistic-cosmological-argument/

Stones  Paint It Black  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EBUFtoC2oj4