--   Where you going now

What are you trying to outrun
Or run down

 

                               If its trying to escape why not let it go

Just   let   it   go

Because theres nothing behind you

Nothing  pursuing you

--   And what if I say I feel something is after me   or ahead of me

--   Then I would say feeling isnt suffice  It doesnt justify being ambivalence to what is right here right now 
In this very moment

                               

Here  And Now

Every moment squandered is irretrievable and later may foster regrets or misgivings 

I cant counsel you if you refuse to pay attention to yourself

Ultimately were talking about you

--   Are you suggesting  saying 

what I feel panting behind me   or leering before me

is me

--   Im not suggesting anything other than if you cant stop or pause
become aware of who you are

You cant appreciate the moment

--   No one is

--   Are you no one

--

--   Then
               thats good for me to know

                                                       

I wont waste your precious time
 

Ill let you

I can abide my own words

I can let go

2154,  Sunday,  20  9. 15

Paul Tillich  The Lost Dimension in Religion, 1958:  . . . every moment . . runs ahead . . . is filled with something which must be done or seen or planned . . . no one can experience depth without stopping and becoming aware of himself . . . Only if he has moments in which he does not care about what comes next can he experience the meaning of this moment here and now and ask himself about the meaning of his life . . .

--   Whas wid da pous pous

--   What did you say

--   I said whas wid da pous pous

--   Im sorry  What are you saying

--   I was asking indie  the pous  puss

whats with his puss  his face  his pous

                                                                    Whas wid da pous pous

--   Why dont you just say it plainly   in English

--   As if he understands English  or French    or Spanish

I talk gutturally to him as I please because he doesnt understand a word of what Im saying or frankly could give a shit

Unlike you   apparently

--   Im saying you wouldnt speak to a child like that

--   No I wouldnt  I agree

   

However the flaw in your perception is that a cat indie is not a child

Fur baby et al 

Nyet  Not a child

No hope to be a child in this life

That said 

                 a cat may be able to appreciate music   and whas wid da pous pous seems to me   lyrical

English  nahsamuch

--   I get it

--   Thought you might

--   Just dont talk to me like that please

--   But yous got a pous babe

Eys do loves yer pous

--   For Gods sake

--   Leave the inerrant one out

Let him stick his perfect finger into someone elses peach pie

Leave mine the fuck alone

--   Not so lyrical

--   Maybe not

Tho I could sing it if you like

Yous my peach pie and gobbler yah

--  Yes  An some

1628,  Day-between-Two-Ts,  21  10. 15     

I may have been born a skeptic

to the best of my reckoning  --  I did ask my parents in kind if my memory served me correctly  that for among our dense immediate family  I say dense only because we shared a one and a half bath house among eleven  --  to the best of my reckoning I was the only child who displayed a pyrotechnic proclivity to challenge authority

                                                                                                                                                           any authority  

a birth defect

  

accursed

perhaps it accounted for my belligerence my questions deemed argumentative despite it not being my intent to argue

I asked a question  with the assumption that if the other answered it I might better understand their reasoning and thereby it would help clarify their position

they immediately and curtly took a defensive posture

I naturally assume a thoughtful person would be grateful for a question asked of them on the slim chance that it had not occurred to them  --  therefore the thin web of possibility or ignorance they may have looked through  the light inconsiderate  unable to see it correctly  rendered transparent  --  if tilted slightly  it might be made apparent    revealed

Why would such a question be reviled

      Lets play a game of Realism

                                                       “(It) believes in the possibility of distinguishing in Politics between(wait for it!)

Truth and Opinion  --  between what is true objectively and rationally, supported by evidence and illuminated by reason, and what is only a subjective judgment divorced from fact as they are and informed by prejudice and wishful thinking*(Smells like Republican Spirit(my apologeezs to Nirvana))”

playing said Realism also had him on the other side of the coin in regards to the inerrant Word of the Bible or any religious book or professed dogma

inerrant was just another word for perfect

he couldnt help but consider that something that is perfect cant be recognised by imperfect human beings

they would be excluded to consider by their imperfection alone

flawed cannot recognise flawless

it hasnt the capacity

thus the heavy burden of skepticism   and for the skeptic

he was a born skeptic

   

1409,  Monday,  19  10. 15

* pg 4  Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, 4^th Edition, 1967, Hans J. Morgenthau